Grove Press
Grove Press
Grove Press

American Nomads

Travels with Lost Conquistadors, Mountain Men, Cowboys, Indians, Hoboes, Truckers, and Bullriders

by Richard Grant

“Grant succumbs to indigenous American wanderlust, exploring the land mostly left of the Mississippi in a journey of discovery for himself and other agoraphobics. . . . [American Nomads is] a diverting jaunt with vagabonds of the West’s open roads and backwoods: mobile nobility nicely considered.” —Kirkus Reviews

  • Imprint Grove Paperback
  • Page Count 320
  • Publication Date February 11, 2005
  • ISBN-13 978-0-8021-4180-4
  • Dimensions 5.5" x 8.25"
  • US List Price $16.00

About The Book

Fascinated by the land of endless horizons, sunshine, and the open road, Richard Grant spent fifteen years wandering throughout the United States, never spending more than three weeks in one place, and getting to know America’s nomads—truckers, tramps, rodeo cowboys, tie-dyed T-shirt concert followers, flea market traders, retirees who live year-round in their RVs, and the murderous Freight Train Riders of America (FTRA).

As an outsider aching for the “balm of motion,” Grant uses these lives and his own to examine the myths and realities of the wandering life, and its contradiction with the sedentary American dream. “Forget the white picket fence, the house in the suburbs, the monthly mortgage payment and all that crap,” says a truck driver Grant rode with on one of his adventures. “Americans dream about burning down the house and saddling up the horse and it’s been that way ever since the plains were knee deep in buffalo shit.”

Along with a personal account, American Nomads traces the history of wandering in the New World, through vividly told stories of frontiersmen, fur trappers and cowboys, Comanche and Apache warriors, all the way back to the first Spanish explorers who crossed the continent. What unites these disparate characters, as they range back and forth across the centuries, is a stubborn conviction that the only true freedom is to roam across the land.


“Grant is a lyrical, yet controlled writer. He can sketch better landscape than just about any travel journalist alive, which makes it easy to imagine ourselves in the boots of explorers in a strange land. . . . Almost every page in American Nomads features a piece of writing so graceful and energetic that it makes you want to grab your wallet and head to the nearest Trailways bus station. . . . [Grant] shows us another way of life.” —John Freeman, Denver Post

“An entertaining series of treks through the American West, and an examination of what makes so many of us—including Grant—want to ramble. . . .The theme that connects these tales is the persistence in America of people who favor a nomadic existence, scorning what Grant calls ‘sedentary society.’ [The] trip through Grant’s book. . .[is] a ride worth taking.” —Tom Tolan, The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel

“Grant is a great storyteller. . . . Like fellow Brits Jonathan Raban and Alistair Cooke, Grant has a greater appreciation for things American than most of us do. He loves our culture and history. . . . Sometimes it takes an outsider to see what’s inside us.” —William McKeen, The St. Petersburg Times

“Grant is a good writer. . . . He doesn’t patronize the United States. . . . His delight in and wonder at America are genuine.” —Jonathan Yardley, The Washington Post Book World

“Grant shows his appreciation and understanding of boots that are made for walking. . . . Grant’s is participatory journalism at its best, because even when he’s writing historically, he is himself a wanderer. . . . If you’ve ever started the car with a full tank of gas and just headed out, if you’ve ever hitchhiked or picked up a hitchhiker, if you look at the highway and see possibilities, this is your bible.” —Susan Campbell, The Hartford Courant

American Nomads is a thorough and fascinating exploration of this American ethos that takes the forms of straight history, profiles of contemporary nomads, and occasional autobiography.” —John Dicker, The Colorado Springs Independent

“Shaggy-dogged, big-hearted and stuffed with fabulous detail about Indians and Spanish explorers. . . . Almost every page in American Nomads features . . . prose so graceful and energetic that it makes you want to grab your wallet and head to the nearest bus station.” —John Freeman, The Tucson Weekly

“Incomparable. . . . Grant is a writer of rare observation and talent, able to turn his experiences into witty and probing looks at just what it is about wandering around the West that holds such enduring allure. . . . The stories are terrific, mostly because Grant sees more in the people he meets than most any of us would. . . . Grant is unfailingly open-minded and brilliantly well-versed in all the history and sociology of the Americas. A traveler and a reader, both, and a heckuva writer.” —Marta Salij, Detroit Free Press Book Club

“[American Nomads] is a thoroughly enjoyable book, one that, in the best tradition of writers from far-off shores, makes us see what we already know in new and unexpected ways. . . . Grant is unsparing in describing the debauchery that is A-Camp’s only reason for being, but he also describes the tolerance and support, even selflessness, that the Camp and its denizens. . . produce in the rest of the Gathering. It is a deft and sympathetic portrait of an often-misunderstood collection of American Nomads.” —Patrick Quinn, Mountain Gazette

American Nomads closely examines the drifters among us. . . and mixes in some interesting, well-documented history to keep you entertained during the ride. . . . As worthwhile for its historical content as its social commentary, and packaged in a fast-paced, inspiring narrative.” —Dave Russell, Citizen Times

“This small gem of a book is vastly entertaining, surprisingly informative, and whips up a nearly irresistible urge to hit the open road at full throttle.” —Tom Powers, The Flint Journal

“A lively . . . pastiche of travelogue. . . . [Grant] parallels his own travels through the American Southwest with those of earlier explorers, conquerors, cowboys, Indians, bikers and hoboes.” —Publishers Weekly

“Grant succumbs to indigenous American wanderlust, exploring the land mostly left of the Mississippi in a journey of discovery for himself and other agoraphobics. . . . [American Nomads is] a diverting jaunt with vagabonds of the West’s open roads and backwoods: mobile nobility nicely considered.” —Kirkus Reviews

“A wondrous essay, documenting a style of life that eschews government authority. . . . [Grant] has penned a travelogue par excellence, cloaked in the robes of a sociological examination of the American nomad. . . . For all the problems inherent in such a lifestyle, readers may still fantasize about what life could be like away from the rat race.” —Allen Weakland, Booklist

“[Grant’s] definition of America as a ‘restless land’ is a good one. . . . His writing is as restless as his travels. . . . He often describes the seedy side of American life, but he maintains a wicked sense of humor throughout he book that makes it consistently entertaining and informative.” —Joseph L. Carlson, Library Journal

“Perhaps only an Englishman with their grand tradition of explorers and wanderers could give us this absolutely fresh look at ourselves from a direction we had not imagined. Richard Grant is obviously a courageous man, and a fine writer, with a bit of mad dog mixed in.” —Jim Harrison

American Nomads is a wonderful book, sure to delight all who love the American open road and the odd pilgrims who choose to make their lives on it or beside it.” —Larry McMurtry

On the Road. Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. Leaves of Grass. Walden. Junky. Anything by Frank O’Hara, Ken Kesey, or Dr. Timothy Leary. Johnny Cash’s Folsom Prison Blues. If you enjoyed any of these, you will probably enjoy Richard Grant’s [American Nomads].” —Ian Sansom, The Guardian (UK)

“Reminiscent of field-trip accounts by writers like Jack London and George Orwell . . . A remarkable first book.” —Peter Cross, Sunday Express (UK)

“An excellent book. Grant is both a fine writer and a brave man.” —George Rosie, Sunday Herald (UK)


Finalist for the 2004 Thomas Cook Travel Literature Award
Chosen for the Detroit Free Press Book Club


Chapter One

Notes from an all-night truck stop on the outskirts of Albuquerque. Drinking coffee in a red vinyl booth, gazing out of the window at the gas pumps, I watch the nomads come and go in the night, making their desert crossings: a gang of bikers en route to the rendezvous in Sturgis, South Dakota; six migrant workers in a rattletrap jalopy, following the ripening harvest from Texas to Montana; a vanload of tie-dyed teenagers, headed for the next Phish concert or Rainbow Gathering; truck drivers, traveling salesmen, rambling flea-market vendors; an itinerant preacher in a camper rig nailed together from planks of wood and scrap metal: “Rev. Dale Billings—Traveling Revival—Sinners Welcome.”

From the shadowed canyons between the parked Kenworths and Peterbilts (where they drink malt liquor and denounce their enemies), bearded, furrow-faced road tramps and drifters emerge into the sodium glare, shambling across the forecourt to bum cigarettes and sparfée change.

Across the interstate, parked in neat, orderly rows at an electrified campground, are forty or fifty RVs, Recreational Vehicles, the huge, luxurious motor homes favored by the peripatetic retirees of the Southwest.

RV brand names: Wanderer, Sundowner, Sunchaser, Airstream, Nomad.

Through a Western truck-stop window in the early hours of the morning, it seems like half of America is perpetually on the move: picking up and making a fresh start somewhere else, traveling for a pay cheque, or just traveling to be traveling, moving for the sake of motion. Wanderlust, restlessness, itchy feet, antsy pants, white-line fever. There is more of it here than in Europe, or anywhere else in the industrialized world: the nagging conviction that a better life lies somewhere down the road, or on the road itself. Does it begin on the inside, or filter in from the outside? Is it nature, nurture or disease?

Here’s what the sedentary doctors have to say. Dromomania: an abnormal, obsessive desire to roam. Drapetomania: an uncontrollable desire to wander away from home. A nomad, of course, would produce vigorous arguments to the contrary: that being sedentary is a forced, unnatural and oppressive condition for human beings. That the desire to travel is an innate human urge—a genetic legacy perhaps, from the million years we spent as wandering hunter-gatherers. This was Bruce Chatwin’s big idea, that humans have similar migratory instincts to certain birds and animals. Why is a human baby calmed by the motion of rocking and swaying? he asked. Because, for 99.9 percent of our evolutionary span, this is what human babies experienced as the natural rhythm of life, strapped to their mothers’ bodies in slings or cradleboards, “rocked into contentment by the gentle swaying walk.”

The sedentary doctor smiles a patronizing smile: a dromomaniac can always produce a good reason to roam, just as an alcoholic can always find a good reason to take another drink. And, like alcoholism, it is a disease that afflicts a disproportionate number of men. But what does a sedentary doctor know? Has he ever experienced the pure rush of freedom that comes from leaving it all behind—the debts, the ties, the possessions and responsibilities—and launching out into the wild blue yonder? Has he ever been secretly tempted?

“Truck driving is the ultimate fulfillment of the American dream.” This is the bold claim of Mike Hatfield, twenty-four, from Reno, Nevada, hauling a load of mattresses across the country, taking time out for a cup of coffee and a bowl of chilli. Slim, bespectacled, well read, cheerful—you would never pick him for a trucker.

“Forget the little house on the prairie,” he says. “Forget the white picket fence, the house in the suburbs, the monthly mortgage payment, the two-car garage and the rest of that crap. Americans dream about the road. We dream about burning down the house and saddling up the horse, and it’s been that way ever since the plains were knee-deep in buffalo shit.”

Mike turns out to be a Western history enthusiast, an amateur scholar of sorts. The cab of his Peterbilt and the sleeper compartment behind are full of books, ranging from pulp gunfighter fiction to the learned, historical tomes of Bernard De Voto and Walter Prescott Webb. The books are well thumbed, dog-eared and coffee-stained, with scrawled comments spidering up the margins and key passages underlined in pencil. The marked passages all address the same theme. “After the Indians came the cowboys and prospectors and railroad men, and they were just about as loose-footed and freedom-loving and prone to rambling. I’m a quarter Cheyenne Indian, and three-quarters Scotch-Irish cowboy. The way I look at it, I was born to roam.”

He gives me a ride east into Texas, eating little white pills, chain-smoking Marlboros and talking a blue streak through the night. We are out on the vast tableland emptiness of the Staked Plains, the Llano Estacado, the windswept heartland of the old Comanche country, when the first gray light appears in the east. Mike pulls over to the side of the road and brews up some coffee on a camp stove. He is an aficionado of the dawn and will often stop to watch it rise.

The first rim of sun crests the horizon and a pale apricot light spreads across the blue-gray plain, with the moon still visible in the west, and the coyotes yammering and howling, celebrating the night’s hunting perhaps, or the simple fact of being a coyote. Our shadows take form behind us, elongated like figures in a funhouse mirror.

There is a line of telephone poles along the side of the road. The wires hang in loose stitches across the sky. There is a barbed-wire fence clogged with tumbleweeds, and beyond the fence the eye leaps out to the horizon across forty or fifty miles of smooth, pure space.

“Look at this country,” Mike says. “It wasn’t made for settling down in. It’s too big and dry and wide open. The Lord intended man and beast to move about in a country like this. The Comanches knew it, the cowboys knew it, the buffalo knew it. Man, can you imagine? All this covered with buffalo, just black with buffalo all the way to the horizon. That’s how big the herds got, as far as you could see.”

No one knows how many bison used to roam the Great Plains. The estimates vary between 50 million and 125 million. Whatever the number, it is safe to say that no large wild animal ever grew so numerous, anywhere on Earth, and the key to their success in this environment was mobility. The herds grazed into the wind, which blows almost constantly on the plains. The species evolved with the wind, developing huge shaggy heads and shoulders, for facing down the howling winter blizzards, and small, lean, short-furred, curiously pert hindquarters. In the course of a normal year, the winds on the Great Plains shifted counterclockwise through all four quarters of the compass, so the herd migrations formed a rough circle or ellipse, three or four hundred miles across, passing through cooler locations in summer and warmer ones in winter, always moving toward fresh grazing and water.

Occasionally, the wind blew too long from the southwest and buffalo in their thousands trailed off into the deserts and died of starvation and thirst. The Montana herds sometimes ended up in the far, frozen north of Canada, lured to their deaths by a soft, persistent, northerly breeze in the early part of winter. But these were rare and inconsequential events. Maybe you can grasp the figure of 60 million or 125 million. Mike and I have tried and failed.

It took less than thirty years to bring the herds to the brink of extinction, and most of the killing was done in a single decade, the 1870s. By 1883, only two or three hundred buffalo were left, kept for nostalgia’s sake on private ranches. White hide-hunters did most of the killing, working with the approval of the white authorities, and most of the white population, who saw the slaughter of the buffalo as the final solution to the Indian problem. The problem, as always, was how to dispossess the Indians of their land. There was an element of imperialist conspiracy at work, but it was capitalist economics, the emergence of a booming market for buffalo leather in the East and Europe, which accounted for the speed and rapacity of the slaughter, and sent five thousand freelance hide-hunters out onto the plains. Killing and skinning buffalo was exhausting, filthy, dangerous work—up to your shoulders in gore most of the time, and constantly watching for Indians—but for a while the market paid enough to make it worth the risk. Enough, that is, for whiskey and a whore and a gambling spree, when you got back to town and sold your hides.

The meat was left to rot on the prairie, fouling the air for hundreds of miles around. It was a fine, fat, lazy time to be a wolf, or a vulture, or any scavenger of carrion, and a terrible, hungry, world-wrenching time to be an Indian. Not that Indians hadn’t contributed to the slaughter. As subsistence hunters, they had barely dented the herds, but by the 1870s they too were entangled in the market economy. They needed more hides than they used to, to trade for guns, ammunition, iron cooking pots, steel knives, needles, awls, cloth, mirrors, coffee, sugar, whiskey and other products of white civilization on which they had become dependent. And contrary to popular belief, Indians did not always use every part of the buffalo. If, for example, an Indian was being pursued, or traveling alone, or needing trade goods in a hurry, or craving whiskey, he might take the hide and the tongue, leave the carcass to rot, and think little of it.

Nevertheless, Indians were horrified by the way the hide-men laid waste to the herds, killing relentlessly and methodically until no animals were left, and then moving on to the next herd, wasting unimaginable quantities of meat. Surely this was a sign of sickness or insanity. Indian hunting practices were not always as tidy and thorough as they are remembered, but the plains tribes did feel a deep, religious reverence for the buffalo, which gave up its life in a sacred transaction so that Indians could live. The great herds had seemed as timeless and elemental as the grass or the wind, and when they disappeared Indians refused to believe it at first, saying the buffalo had gone up to Canada or taken refuge underground. Even the white hide-hunters were astonished that they had killed themselves out of a living in so short a time.

Later, a new market arose, and a rabble army of bone-pickers went out onto the plains. The bones were stacked in immense ricks by the railroad, sixty or seventy feet high, waiting to be shipped east and ground into fertilizer, turned into buttons, combs and glue. Men posed in front of the bone-ricks for photographers, with shabby hats and bristling mustaches, looking like mean, proud, haunted, belligerent dwarfs. If all the bones had been loaded at once, calculated the Topeka Mail and Breeze, they would have filled a freight train 7575 miles long, more than twice the distance from San Francisco to New York.

By the end of the great slaughter, in 1883, all the nomadic plains tribes had been corralled into reservations, to be forcibly instructed in the arts of Christian piety, private property ownership and sedentary farming. By 1886 the footloose trail cowboy was gone from the plains too, working on ranches now and sleeping in bunkhouses, fenced off the open range by the settlers he despised. His heyday had lasted only twenty years, and represented the last gasp of mounted nomadism in North America. There were still a few wandering outlaws, recalcitrant Indians and horse thieves left out in the back country and the canyons, but in short order they were hunted down and brought in, and the West was pronounced conquered, tamed and settled.

Traveling around the region today, it doesn’t always feel that way. Settlement, and the feeling of settlement, does not occupy the land in the same way that it does back East, or in Europe. It is not just the vast, empty spaces, or all the drifters on the highway, or the ghost towns, being seeded back into prairie by the wind, or the dying family farms, defeated by the harshness of the climate and the machinations of corporate agriculture. The restless, rootless, migratory history of the West is also evident in its cities.

In Albuquerque, Phoenix, Tucson and Las Vegas, urban populations are growing faster than anywhere else in the country, yet these booming, sprawling, modern cities have a flimsy, impermanent presence, at least to an eye trained in Europe. You drive through miles of trailer parks and mobile-home encampments, through brave new suburbs and utopian retirement communities—frame and Sheetrock dream homes, built on a vanishing water supply, designed to make a fast buck for the development company and fall apart in twenty or thirty years: “disposable homes,” to borrow a phrase from a friend of mine who builds them for a living. In Phoenix, the most transitory of Western cities, 40 percent of the population have lived there for less than five years, and 50 percent say they plan to leave as soon as they get the chance.

Maybe it’s just a matter of time. Maybe in another hundred years the wide open spaces will be gone, or reduced to islands in a sea of concrete, and the inhabitants will come to feel rooted in place. Given time, perhaps, the settlement of the West will be completed, but there remains a formidable obstacle that never existed in the East or in Europe.

Except for a small, soggy corner in the Pacific Northwest, aridity is the dominant characteristic of the American West, the organizing principle of its geography and biology, and the ultimate limit on its ambition of never-ending growth. The underground aquifers, which took millions of years to form, by slow accretion of scant rainfall, are plummeting dramatically. The major river of the Southwest, the Colorado, is already so tapped for irrigation that it no longer reaches the sea. Aridity explains why the grass on this prairie grows in separate bunches, rather than close-packed turf, why there are no trees rooted in the soil, why the rivers and the towns are so far apart. A buffalo seeking water and a truck driver seeking breakfast must travel the same approximate distance to find what they need to move on.

Aridity literally creates space. Where there is no moisture to mist up the air, and no trees to block the view, the human field of vision expands dramatically. From the ramparts of Bryce Canyon in Utah you can see for 180 miles on a clear day—London to Manchester—and still wonder what lies over the horizon. Unless some kind of technological rain dance is devised, it seems likely that the West will remain dominated by big empty spaces, and a certain type of human being will feel compelled to wander across them. First rule of nomadism: open space invites mobility.

“It is geography at bottom, a hell of a wide land from the beginning,” wrote Charles Olson in Call Me Ishmael, “a stretch of earth—seas on both sides, no barriers to contain as restless a thing as Western man.” Asked to define America in a sentence, Gertrude Stein said, “Conceive a space filled with moving.”

>”I think of myself as a latter-day cowboy,” says Mike, driving on for Amarillo. “But it doesn’t have anything to do with Western movies, or Marlboro billboards, or any of that bullshit. It’s in my blood. My family has been roaming around the West for four generations, and a hell of a lot longer if you count my grandmother’s people.”

Mike’s great-grandfather crossed these plains on horseback, driving herds of Longhorn cattle from south Texas to the railheads at Dodge City and Ogallala, and up to Montana and the Dakotas. When the range was fenced, he went to Wyoming and worked on cattle ranches, between stints as a rustler and spells in jail. At the age of fifty he married a woman in San Francisco and they raised three children on her father’s ranch in Nevada.

Mike’s grandfather was another roaming ranch hand, moving from one bunkhouse to the next across the northern plains. He married a woman from the Northern Cheyenne reservation in Montana, and they had four children together, raised in six different houses.

Mike’s father did a little cowboying in his younger days, got sick of the wages, and became an oil-field roustabout, following the work around Texas, Oklahoma, Wyoming and up into Alaska and the Yukon territory. He married a blackjack dealer in Reno at the age of forty and tried his hand at settling down. Two years later he was gone, back to the oil-fields, and promising to send money for the baby.

“I was raised by my mom,” says Mike. “Dad would show up once or twice a year, they would have a fight, and he would leave. What did they fight about? The usual stuff. He wanted us to come with him up to Fairbanks, or Billings, or the Yukon, or wherever the hell he was working that season, and live in a tent or trailer, depending on how much of his wages he was drinking at the time. Mom wanted to stay in Reno, and keep us fed on that steady pay check.”

When he turned twenty-one, Mike enrolled in truck-driving school. He took out a loan to buy a secondhand truck, and he has been on the road for three years now. He gets his mail sent to his mother’s house in Reno, but he feels no roots or ties there, or anywhere else, and home is the cab of his Peterbilt. “This is the closest thing you’re going to find to freedom in modern America,” he says. “There’s a lot of bullshit with insurance and regulations and taxes, and I might never get out of debt, but I’m still a free man on the move, and I believe that’s how I’m meant to live.”

Mike says I’m asking the wrong questions, that I have it all twisted inside-out. “You’re asking why there’s all these people living on the road, and the real question is why anyone would want to stay put. Why would you want to live in the same damn box all your life, or maybe a bigger box if you work hard enough and kiss enough ass?” Spoken like a true nomad. The same sentiments have been voiced over the centuries by Bedouins, Kazakhs, Mongols, Apaches, Comanches, Crows, Sioux and Mike’s own Cheyenne ancestors. Nomads have always scorned the sedentary as weak, craven dupes who have sold out their freedom in exchange for security and comfort. And the sedentary have always stereotyped nomads as unruly, irresponsible and morally reprehensible—a threat to hearth and home, to law and order, and to civilization itself—while simultaneously envying and romanticizing their lives.

I want to know about Mike Hatfield’s love life, his capacity for emotional connection. His Cheyenne great-grandparents traveled within a tightly knit mobile community, with wives, children, grandparents, siblings, cousins, in-laws and childhood friends in tow, but that is no longer possible. A commitment to nomadism in modern America usually entails a rejection, or a postponement, or an escape from all of this. “What about wives, kids, raising a family?” I ask him. “What about belonging to a community?”

“I belong to a community,” he says, and strikes up a conversation on the CB radio to prove his point. “As far as raising a family goes, hell, raise them on the road. There’s a buddy of mine who drives with his wife and daughter in the truck. They’re on some kind of home-schooling program and his wife spends four or five hours a day teaching the kid. That kid is eight years old and she’s smart as a whip. She can tell you all about Civil War battlefields, and Indian massacre sites, and the Congress and the Senate in DC, because she’s been to all those places and seen them with her own eyes. They’re not just some old thing she’s read about in a schoolbook, or the teacher told her about.”

This is where Mike Hatfield sees himself in ten or fifteen years, rolling down the highway, in a bigger truck, with a wife and kid next to him and a mobile connection to an Internet home-schooling program. “In the meantime,” he adds, “I’m happy to pick up women where I find them, have a good time and say my farewells. I don’t take advantage of women. I’m upfront about it. They know I drive a truck.”

For me, the love ’em and leave ’em strategy so common among wandering males started by default. Short of celibacy, it didn’t seem like I had a choice, because I could never persuade a woman to quit her job, give up her house or apartment, and live on the road with me. With experience, and a few false unhappy starts, I discovered that the key to making this strategy work was not to fall in love. Love spoiled everything and it wasn’t worth the heartache. So I learned to make do with sex and companionship, on a fleeting or intermittent basis, and I usually ended up with women who were cheating on their boyfriends or husbands. Which persuaded me further that love and commitment were a sucker’s game.

Recently, I came to the decision that this was unhealthy, that I was missing out on something important. I made a heartfelt and committed decision to curb my wanderings and get serious with a woman in Tucson, who happened to be cheating on her boyfriend. The boyfriend was in France and she wasn’t serious about him and I really liked her, so I rented a nice little house in Tucson, bought a bed and a few thrift-store furnishings, and we moved in together. Three weeks later, I was climbing the walls and she left in a rage, putting a motorcycle boot through a glass panel in my front door. My truck was being repaired so I loaded up a backpack with clothes and books and started hitchhiking east.

I wasn’t always this way. In London I was a long-term-relationship man: three years, then four years. In London I managed to live under the same roof for four years. It’s true that I was often surly and discontented under that roof, and longed to get out of England, but I thought in terms of moving to another city, in another country, and making a permanent home there. In London I would not have reacted to a relationship breakup by walking out to the highway and raising my thumb.

These restless, roaming urges, this ache for the balm of motion: it was something that happened to me in America, something that happened to a persistent minority of all Europeans who crossed the Atlantic, all the way back to the beginning. The internal feelings of restlessness and dislocation, which all emigrants bring with them to some degree, came into contact with all that space and possibility, and a culture of mobility that dated back to the Indians. Much as Europeans tried to re-create their sedentary societies and close-knit, coercive communities under these conditions, they weren’t always successful.

“Many crept out through a broken wall,” wrote John Winthrop, the first governor of the Massachusetts colony. He was referring to the thin but steady exodus of disaffected Puritans—usually rebellious young men and “disgraced” young women—who ran off into the wilderness and never returned. They became roaming hunters, trappers, wives, mothers, traders, and many of them joined up with Indian tribes. These were the first English-speakers to turn nomadic in America, and there were Frenchmen and Spaniards who pre-dated them. If you dig down to the roots of American wanderlust, it is a process of going native, of Europeans being conquered by America—by the immensity of its geography and the nomadic cultures they found here. And I have come to think of myself as some bastard, postmodern footnote to this tradition.